BUSHNELL v. CROOKE MINING & SMELTING CO.

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

BUSHNELL v. CROOKE MINING & SMELTING CO.(1893)

No. 195

Argued: Decided: October 30, 1893

A. R. Bushnell, for the motion. [150 U.S. 82, 83]

Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.

We should not have been called on to reiterate the rule that an application for a rehearing cannot be entertained when presented after the expiration of the term at which the judgment was rendered. Hudson v. Guestier, 7 Cranch, 1; Browder v. McArthur, 7 Wheat. 58; Sibald v. U. S., 12 Pet. 488; Brooks v. Railroad Co., 102 U.S. 107 ; Williams v. Conger, 131 U.S. 390 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 793. Application denied.

FindLaw Career Center

Select a Job Title

Post a Job | Careers Home