Matthew August LeFande, Appellant v. Carolyn Anne Mische-Hoeges, Appellee

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Matthew August LeFande, Appellant v. Carolyn Anne Mische-Hoeges, Appellee

No. 16-7135

Decided: May 17, 2017

BEFORE: Griffith, Srinivasan, and Pillard, Circuit Judges

ORDER

Upon consideration of the motion for summary reversal, the opposition thereto, and the reply; the motion for summary affirmance, the opposition thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motions for summary reversal and summary affirmance be denied. The merits of the parties' positions are not so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam).

Because the court has determined that summary disposition is not in order, the Clerk is instructed to calendar this case for presentation to a merits panel.

Per Curiam