Anica Ashbourne, Appellant v. GHW

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Anica Ashbourne, Appellant v. Donna Hansberry, Director, GHW, et al., Appellees

No. 15-5351

Decided: September 16, 2016

BEFORE: Brown, Griffith, and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges


Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the opposition thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be denied. The merits of the parties' positions are not so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam).

Because the court has determined that summary disposition is not in order, the Clerk is directed to enter a briefing schedule.

Per Curiam

Copied to clipboard