Zoran Zuza, Appellant v. Office of the High Representative, et al., Appellees

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Zoran Zuza, Appellant v. Office of the High Representative, et al., Appellees

No. 16-7027

Decided: June 24, 2016

BEFORE: Griffith, Srinivasan, and Millett, Circuit Judges

ORDER

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the response thereto, and the reply; the motion for summary reversal, the response thereto, and the reply; the motion for disposition without oral argument and the response thereto; and the motion to strike, the response thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion to strike be denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance and the motion for summary reversal be denied. The merits of the parties' positions are not so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam). Because the court has determined that summary disposition is not in order, the Clerk is instructed to calendar this case for presentation to a merits panel. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for disposition without oral argument be referred to the merits panel to which this petition for review is assigned.

Per Curiam