UNITED STATES v. GREYBULL (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alexander GREYBULL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19-30073

Decided: October 23, 2019

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges. Bryan Timothy Dake, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USGF - Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, Leif Johnson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff - Appellee Alexander Greybull, Pro Se Joslyn Michelle Hunt, FDMT-Federal Defenders of Montana, Helena, MT, for Defendant - Appellant

MEMORANDUM **

Alexander Greybull appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 180-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846; possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a); possession of a firearm during a drug trafficking offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c); and being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Greybull’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Greybull the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.