United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. COMMISSIONER OF the INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, in his official capacity, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Decided: September 30, 2020
Before WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge, MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge, ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge
Kenneth J. Falk, Attorney, Gavin M. Rose, Attorney, American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana, Indianapolis, IN, Jennifer Sandman, Attorney, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, New York, NY, Jan P. Mensz, Attorney, Indiana Civil Liberties Union, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee Thomas M. Fisher, Attorney, Office of the Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendants-Appellants Kevin Hayden Theriot, Attorney, Alliance Defending Freedom, Scottsdale, AZ, for Amici Curiae American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Christian Medical & Dental Associations Julie Rikelman, Attorney, Center for Reproductive Rights, New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae Center for Reproductive Rights Roberto J. Gonzalez, Attorney, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Washington, Dc, for Amici Curiae American Medical Women's Association, Association of Reproductive Health Professionals, National Physicians Alliance, Physicians for Reproductive Health Janice Mac Avoy, Attorney, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae Biomedical Ethicists Jeff Landry, Attorney, Louisiana Department of Justice, Baton Rouge, LA, Elizabeth Baker Murrill, Attorney, Office of the Attorney General Civil Division, Baton Rouge, LA, for Amicus Curiae State of Louisiana
On July 2, 2020, the United States Supreme Court granted defendants’ petition for a writ of certiorari, and vacated the decision of this Court and remanded the case to this Court for further consideration in light of June Medical Services, L.L.C. v. Russo, ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 2103, 207 L.Ed.2d 566 (2020). Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., No. 18-1019, ––– U.S. ––––, ––– S.Ct. ––––, ––– L.Ed.2d ––––, 2020 WL 3578669 (July 2, 2020). In light of the parties’ joint Rule 54 statement requesting that we return this case to the district court, we remand to effectuate the parties’ agreement.
It is so ordered.