Skip to main content


Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Liliana ROSAS, Defendant-Appellant

No. 19-40084

Decided: September 27, 2019

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. Bradley Elliot Visosky, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Ernest Gonzalez, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Texas, Plano, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee Liliana Rosas, Pro Se

The attorneys retained to represent Liliana Rosas have moved for leave to withdraw and have filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rosas has not filed a response. We have reviewed the attorneys’ brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with their assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, the attorneys are excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.



PER CURIAM:* FN* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Copied to clipboard