Skip to main content

UNITED STATES v. WILLIAMS (2019)

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marcus Rashawn WILLIAMS, also known as Nuk, also known as Sealed1, also known as Nook, Defendant-Appellant

No. 19-40030

Decided: September 27, 2019

Before CLEMENT, ELROD, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. Terri Lynn Hagan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Bradley Elliot Visosky, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Texas, Plano, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee Marcus Rashawn Williams, Pro Se

Nearly six years after the entry of judgment on his convictions for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine and conspiracy to launder monetary instruments, Marcus Rashawn Williams filed a pro se notice of appeal seeking direct review of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(1). He previously appealed the same convictions.

The Government’s motion for summary dismissal of the appeal as untimely is GRANTED. See United States v. Hernandez-Gomez, 795 F.3d 510, 511 (5th Cir. 2015). The alternative motion for an extension of time to file the appellee’s brief is DENIED as unnecessary. The appeal is DISMISSED.

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE.  

PER CURIAM:* FN* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Copied to clipboard