IN RE: Richard B. MARTIN, Jr., Petitioner.
Richard B. Martin, Jr., petitions for an extraordinary writ, see 28 U.S.C. § 1651; Fed. R. App. P. 21, seeking an order declaring him an officer of the federal judiciary and providing him protection, on threat of criminal prosecution, from impediments to his pro se civil litigation. We conclude that Martin is not entitled to an extraordinary writ for the relief he seeks.
The All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, authorizes the federal courts to “issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.” “The authority to issue a writ under the All Writs Act is not a font of jurisdiction.” United States v. Denedo, 556 U.S. 904, 914, 129 S.Ct. 2213, 173 L.Ed.2d 1235 (2009). Rather, this court's authority to issue extraordinary writs under the All Writs Act “is only incidental to and in aid of [its] appellate jurisdiction, which Congress has given it over district courts, and administrative boards and agencies.” Gurley v. Superior Ct. of Mecklenburg Cnty., 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969) (per curiam) (citations omitted); see Parr v. United States, 351 U.S. 513, 520, 76 S.Ct. 912, 100 L.Ed. 1377 (1956).
The relief sought by Martin is not available by way of an extraordinary writ. Accordingly, we deny the petition for extraordinary writ. We deny Martin's motion to strike and deny as moot his motion to expedite decision. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.