Skip to main content

IN RE: Jha’Vaughn CLARK (2020)

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

IN RE: Jha’Vaughn CLARK, Petitioner.

No. 19-1915

Decided: March 27, 2020

Before WILKINSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Jha’Vaughn Clark, Petitioner Pro Se.

Jha’Vaughn Clark petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2018) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the magistrate judge recently took significant action on Clark’s § 2241 petition. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

PER CURIAM:

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Copied to clipboard