Skip to main content

IN RE: Derick FALLIN (2020)

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

IN RE: Derick FALLIN, a/k/a Black, Petitioner.

No. 19-2274

Decided: March 17, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Derick Fallin, Petitioner Pro Se.

Derick Fallin petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2018) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied Fallin’s § 3582(c)(2) motion on November 15, 2019. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Fallin’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

PER CURIAM:

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Copied to clipboard