Skip to main content

MATHERLY v. MANSUKHANI (2019)

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Thomas Shane MATHERLY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. A. MANSUKHANI, Respondent - Appellee.

No. 19-6643

Decided: August 27, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Thomas Shane Matherly, Appellant Pro Se.

Thomas Shane Matherly, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Matherly v. Mansukhani, No. 5:18-hc-02022-D (E.D.N.C. Apr. 18, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Copied to clipboard