Skip to main content

HANKINS v. NORTH CAROLINA (2019)

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Timothy Omar HANKINS, Sr., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. The State of NORTH CAROLINA; Mary Jean Gurganus; Chad Axford; Jennifer Smith Echols; Kathleen Murphy; John M. Oliver; Sardia Marie Hankins, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 19-1520

Decided: August 26, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reopen his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action and denying his request for mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hankins v. North Carolina, No. 7:18-cv-00037-D (E.D.N.C. May 8, 2019). We deny Hankins’ motion to recuse any judge who has been admitted to the North Carolina bar. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Copied to clipboard