Skip to main content

GRIFFIN v. Donnie Harrison; Officer Gilliam; Officer Lamar; Sergeant Bridges; Officer Bey-Adams; Sergeant Smith; Officer Hammonds; John and Jane Doe, Defendants. (2019)

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Raymond GRIFFIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Captain STEINBECK, Defendant - Appellee, Donnie Harrison; Officer Gilliam; Officer Lamar; Sergeant Bridges; Officer Bey-Adams; Sergeant Smith; Officer Hammonds; John and Jane Doe, Defendants.

No. 19-6785

Decided: August 27, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Raymond Alan Griffin, Appellant Pro Se.

Raymond Griffin appeals the district court's orders granting Defendant's summary judgment motion in Griffin's 42 U.S.C.§ 1983 (2012) action and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. Griffin v. Steinbeck, No. 5:15-ct-03276-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 2018 & May 2, 2019). We deny Griffin's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Copied to clipboard