Skip to main content

JONES v. WELLS FARGO BANK 2006 026 100 (2019)

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Victor O. JONES, Jr., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.; Government National Mortgage Association, as Trustee for Ginnie Mae Remic Trust 2006-026; John Does 1-100, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 18-2168

Decided: May 31, 2019

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Victor O. Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Todd Carroll, Columbia, South Carolina, Shelton Sterling Laney, III, WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Victor O. Jones, Jr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Jones’ complaint with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman * doctrine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 6:17-cv-02486-BHH (D.S.C. Sept. 4, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.



FOOTNOTE.   D.C. Ct. of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Tr. Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923).


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Copied to clipboard