Skip to main content

IN RE: Jamel LAW (2019)

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

IN RE: Jamel LAW, Petitioner.

No. 19-1190

Decided: April 30, 2019

Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Jamel Law, Petitioner Pro Se. Daniel J. Olinghouse, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Respondent.

Jamel Law petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motions to correct clear error and for consideration. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

PER CURIAM:

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Copied to clipboard