Skip to main content

BADER v. KURDYS (2019)

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Gregory BADER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Mark Clifford KURDYS; Roberts & Stevens, P.A., Defendants - Appellees.

No. 18-2408

Decided: April 29, 2019

Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Gregory Bader, Appellant Pro Se. Cynthia L. Van Horne, POYNER SPRUILL, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Gregory Bader appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his claims against Defendants and granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants on their breach of contract counterclaim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bader v. Kurdys, No. 1:16-cv-00294-GCM, 2017 WL 3834724 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2017). We deny Bader's motion for a transcript at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Copied to clipboard