Skip to main content

UNITED STATES v. ALOMIA TORRES (2019)

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Juan Bautista ALOMIA-TORRES, a/k/a Juan Baustista-Alomia, a/k/a Luis Antonio Torres, a/k/a Edward Martinez, a/k/a Luis Alfredo Martinez, a/k/a John the Jamaican, a/k/a John, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 18-7449

Decided: April 29, 2019

Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Juan Bautista Alomia-Torres, Appellant Pro Se.

Juan Bautista Alomia-Torres appeals the district court's order construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive and unauthorized 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it without prejudice on that basis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Alomia-Torres, Nos. 3:97-cr-00040-FDW-2; 3:18-cv-00549-FDW; 3:01-cv-00301-FDW (W.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 2018). We deny a certificate of appealability as unnecessary. See United States v. McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 398-400 (4th Cir. 2015); cf. Harbison v. Bell, 556 U.S. 180, 194, 129 S.Ct. 1481, 173 L.Ed.2d 347 (2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Copied to clipboard