Bobby KNIGHT, a/k/a Bobby Knight, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHENEGA SECURITY, INC.; John Thorpe, Chenga Security, Defendants-Appellees, Robert J. Papp, Jr., United States Coast Guard Admiral; Atlantic Electric, LLC; Legrande Richardson; Michael Richardson, individually; Legrande Richardson, Jr., South Carolina State Department of Labor Licensing & Regulation, as Contractor’s Licensing Board; Lewis M. Caswell, South Carolina State Department of Labor Licensing & Regulation, as Contractor’s Licensing Board; James Edward Lady, South Carolina State Department of Labor Licensing & Regulation, as Contractor’s Licensing Board; Daniel B. Lehman, South Carolina State Department of Labor Licensing & Regulation, as Contractor’s Licensing Board; Kimberly L. Lineberger, South Carolina State Department of Labor Licensing & Regulation, as Contractor’s Licensing Board; Bill Neely, South Carolina State Department of Labor Licensing & Regulation, as Contractor’s Licensing Board; Jamie C. Patterson, South Carolina State Department of Labor Licensing & Regulation, as Contractor’s Licensing Board; W. Franklin Walker, South Carolina State Department of Labor Licensing & Regulation, as Contractor’s Licensing Board; Nikki R. Haley, Governor; George Skip Aldrich, Individual, DHS-USCG CHAS; John Thorpe, Chenega Security; Michael Glazier, Individual, DHS-FLETC CHAS, Defendants.
Bobby Knight appeals from the district court’s amended judgment dismissing Knight’s civil claims against several Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s amended judgment. See Knight v. Chenega Sec., Inc., No. 2:15-cv-03199-DCN, 2018 WL 3611454 (D.S.C. July 27, 2018). We grant Knight’s motion to supplement the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.