Skip to main content

IN RE: Dmitry PRONIN (2019)

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

IN RE: Dmitry PRONIN, Petitioner.

No. 18-2250

Decided: March 18, 2019

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dmitry Pronin, Petitioner Pro Se.

Dmitry Pronin petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in scheduling a trial in his suit. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.



Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Copied to clipboard