Skip to main content

BEY v. WARDEN FCI BUTNER (2019)

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Sharu BEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, FCI BUTNER, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 18-7483

Decided: March 14, 2019

Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Sharu Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

Sharu Bey, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bey v. Warden, No. 5:18-hc-02109-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 30, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Copied to clipboard