Skip to main content

MARTINEZ SAENZ v. SESSIONS III (2018)

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Nadia Margarita MARTINEZ-SAENZ, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 18-1248

Decided: September 14, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Nadia Margarita Martinez-Saenz, Petitioner Pro Se. Sara J. Bayram, Lori B. Warlick, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Nadia Margarita Martinez-Saenz, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion on the ground that Martinez-Saenz failed to specify an error of fact or law in the Board’s prior decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1) (2018). We therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Martinez-Saenz (B.I.A. Feb. 8, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

PER CURIAM:

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Copied to clipboard