OWENS EL v. MARYLAND (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

James Joseph OWENS-EL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of MARYLAND; City of Baltimore; Pamela Howerll Cab Co., Respondents-Appellees.

No. 18-1334

Decided: June 25, 2018

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. James Joseph Owens-El, Appellant Pro Se.

James Joseph Owens-El appeals the district court's orders dismissing his mandamus petition for want of jurisdiction and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Owens-El v. Maryland, No. 1:17-cv-03057-JKB, 2017 WL 5257079 (D. Md. Nov. 9, 2017 & Mar. 5, 2018). We deny the motion for the court to intervene and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.