Skip to main content

PHILOGENE v. Bryan Hennessy; Crystal Ray; Trina Colie, Defendants. (2018)

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Clark PHILOGENE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DATA NETWORKS, INC., Defendant-Appellee, Bryan Hennessy; Crystal Ray; Trina Colie, Defendants.

No. 18-1222

Decided: June 25, 2018

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Clark Philogene, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Matthew Branciforte, Brandon Robert Mita, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Clark Philogene appeals the district court's order dismissing with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (6), Philogene's amended civil complaint against his former employer, Data Networks, Inc. In his amended complaint, Philogene alleged racial and national origin discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation claims, all in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2017). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Philogene v. Data Networks, Inc., No. 8:17-cv-01318-PWG, 2018 WL 1014929 (D. Md. filed Feb. 21, 2018 & entered Feb. 22, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Copied to clipboard