Skip to main content

SEWELL v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION (2018)

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Starsha M. SEWELL, M.Ed, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-2083

Decided: January 24, 2018

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Molissa Heather Farber, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Joel William Ruderman, PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court's orders dismissing this action alleging employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and denying Sewell's motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, No. 8:16-cv-02457-PX, 2017 WL 1196614 (D. Md. Mar. 31, 2017; Sept. 12, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Copied to clipboard