TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL v. VTT MANAGEMENT INC VTT CHARLOTTE LLC DEBBIE HICKS CHRISTOPHER LOEBSACK LATONYA CAMERON BRITTANY BANKS VICTOR JIMENEZ MECKLENBURG COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT MARTA CARSON BECKY TIN DONNIE HOOVER ELIZABETH THORTON TROSCH JOHN AND JANE DOES 30

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL, as lawful guardian ad litem of Minor Child A.M., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VTT MANAGEMENT INC.; VTT CHARLOTTE LLC; DEBBIE HICKS; CHRISTOPHER LOEBSACK; LATONYA CAMERON; BRITTANY BANKS; VICTOR JIMENEZ; MECKLENBURG COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT; MARTA CARSON, in her individual and official capacity; BECKY T. TIN, in her individual and official capacity; DONNIE HOOVER, in his individual and official capacity; ELIZABETH THORTON TROSCH, in her individual and official capacity; JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-30, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 17-1841

Decided: January 05, 2018

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Tigress Sydney McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se. James Daniel McAlister, MCANGUS, GOUDELOCK & COURIE, LLC, Charlotte, North Carolina; Daniel Edward Peterson, CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Charlotte, North Carolina; Kathryn Hicks Shields, Assistant Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation and granting some, but not all, Defendants' motions to dismiss. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order McDaniel seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we grant Appellees' motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

PER CURIAM:

Copied to clipboard