RYAN DARK WHITE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ATTORNEY GENERAL ASHCROFT ATTORNEY GENERAL GONZALEZ ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDER ATTORNEY GENERAL LYNCH ATTORNEY GENERAL SESSIONS ROD ROSENSTEIN DONNA HANSEN LARRY HOGAN MARTIN MALLEY UNNAMED DEFENDANTS 200 (2017)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

RYAN DARK WHITE, Name, as Attorney-In-Fact and representing the whole Class of Plaintiffs, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ATTORNEY GENERAL ASHCROFT; ATTORNEY GENERAL GONZALEZ; ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDER; ATTORNEY GENERAL LYNCH; ATTORNEY GENERAL SESSIONS; ROD ROSENSTEIN; DONNA HANSEN, Warden; LARRY HOGAN, Governor of the State of Maryland; MARTIN O'MALLEY, Governor of the State of Maryland; UNNAMED DEFENDANTS, 1-200, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 17-6750

Decided: December 07, 2017

Before DIAZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Ryan Dark White, Appellant Pro Se.

Ryan Dark White appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See White v. United States, No. 1:17-cv-01355-JKB (D. Md. June 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network