STEVE CHADWICK v. WARDEN

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

STEVE C. CHADWICK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 17-6333

Decided: April 28, 2017

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Steve Carl Chadwick, Appellant Pro Se.

Steve C. Chadwick appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Chadwick's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Chadwick has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM: