DARAMUS JONES v. FREDA THORNTON

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

DARAMUS JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FREDA THORNTON, owner, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 16-1705

Decided: October 03, 2016

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Daramus Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Daramus Jones appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Thornton, No. 1:16-cv-00576-JCC-IDD (E.D. Va. June 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM: