UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tommy R. FINDLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Tommy R. Findley appeals his convictions and sentences for production of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) and (e), and possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B) and (b)(2). On appeal, Findley argues that the district court (1) failed to clearly indicate that it conducted a de novo review of the suppression-hearing evidence before denying his motion to suppress; (2) improperly denied his motion to suppress; (3) constructively amended both counts of the indictment; (4) imposed an unreasonable sentence; and (5) erred by restricting his use of a computer with a modem as a condition of supervised release.
After considering the parties’ briefs, the record on appeal, and with the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm Findley’s convictions and sentences.