UNITED STATES v. MULLEN III (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas J. MULLEN, III, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-13769

Decided: July 24, 2018

Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. Michelle Thresher Taylor, U.S. Attorney Service—Middle District of Florida, U.S. Attorney's Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee Yvette Clair Gray, Federal Public Defender's Office, Tampa, FL, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender's Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant Thomas J. Mullen, III, Pro Se

Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for Thomas J. Mullen, III in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mullen’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM: