UNITED STATES v. EVANS

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles EVANS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-16095.

Decided: February 05, 2004

Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and BIRCH and FARRIS*, Circuit Judges. Floyd M. Buford, Jr.,Buford & Buford, Macon, GA, for Defendant-Appellant. Charles L. Calhoun, Macon, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Evans contends that his conviction is not a controlled substance offense because it involved the delivery of chalk rather than cocaine.   Prior circuit authority has considered and answered the precise questions raised by his appeal.

 There is no dispute that Evans pleaded guilty to an offense covered by the controlled substance statute, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846.

 Under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(a)(2), we look only to the elements of the crime of conviction and not the conduct underlying the crime.  United States v. Lipsey, 40 F.3d 1200, 1201 (11th Cir.1994);  See also United States v. Frazier, 89 F.3d 1501 (11th Cir.1996).   A conviction for attempt required proof only that Evans possessed the mens rea required for the underlying crime and took a substantial step toward the commission of that crime.  United States v. Carothers, 121 F.3d 659, 661 (11th Cir.1997).

A defendant is a “career offender” if (1) the defendant was at least eighteen years old at the time the defendant committed the instant offense;  (2) the instant offense of conviction is a felony that is either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense;  and (3) the defendant has at least two prior felony convictions of either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense.  U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1.

These requirements were met here.

AFFIRMED.

FARRIS, Circuit Judge:

Copied to clipboard