APPELLANT v. APPELLEES

Reset A A Font size: Print

Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.

Nancy Simenstad APPELLANT v. R. Keith Spencer and Bailey & Galyen APPELLEES

NO. 02–11–00491–CV

Decided: January 23, 2012

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant's “Motion To Dismiss.”   It is the courts opinion that the motion should be granted;  therefore, we dismiss the appeal.   See Tex.R.App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue.   See Tex.R.App. P. 42.1(d).

PANEL:  DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  January 19, 2012

FOOTNOTES

FN1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4..  FN1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.

Copied to clipboard