IN RE: MICHAEL WAYNE JOHNSON, Relator
Opinion by Justice Bridges
Relator contends the trial court violated a ministerial duty by not ruling on his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a); State of Texas ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 67 S.W.3d 177, 180-81 (Tex.Crim.App.2001); State of Tex. ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex.Crim.App.2001). Accordingly, we DENY relator's petition for writ of mandamus.
DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE