all - Opinion Summaries
Page 393 of 393
Showing Result 3921 - 3929 of 3929
Description | Date | Docket # |
---|---|---|
LEVIN v. INTERNCONTINENTAL CASUALTY INS. CO.Court of Appeals of New York
Civil Procedure, Insurance Law
An unauthorized foreign or alien insurance carrier's pre-answer motion to dismiss constitutes a "pleading" within the meaning of Insurance Law 1213(c)...
|
11/30/2000 | 1 No. 140 |
HAIRSTON v. TRAVELERS CASUALTYUnited States Eleventh Circuit
Insurance Law
Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over claims brought pursuant to National Flood Insurance Program ("NFIP") policies under 42 USC 4072, and...
|
11/13/2000 | 99-11417 |
STEVE FORD, ETC. v. CIMARRON INS. CO., INC.United States Fifth Circuit
Insurance Law
Texas law does not impose a duty on insurers to handle, investigate, and settle claims against insureds, using the standard of care of any reasonable...
|
11/01/2000 | 99-10684 |
AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE v. CITY OF TAMPA HOUSING AUTHORITYUnited States Eleventh Circuit
Insurance Law
Under Florida law, a general commercial liability insurance policy excluding injuries from pollutants did not provide coverage for a lawsuit where...
|
11/01/2000 | 00-10283 |
SIGNATURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES v. ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANYUnited States Tenth Circuit
Insurance Law
Insurance company breached its duty to defend by not responding to settlement overtures, failing to communicate with its insured, and failing to fully...
|
10/31/2000 | 99-1372 |
WESTVIEW ASSOCIATES v. GUARANTY NATIONAL INS. CO.Court of Appeals of New York
Injury & Tort Law, Insurance Law
Where insurance coverage is unclear or ambiguous, ambiguity must be resolved in favor of the insured; if the exclusionary clause lacks the particular...
|
10/26/2000 | 1 No. 110 |
PIRKHEIM v. FIRST UNUM LIFE INS.United States Tenth Circuit
Contracts, ERISA, Insurance Law
General ERISA principles do not permit a court to re-write the terms of an insurance contract. Where the insuring clause or exclusionary provision is...
|
10/25/2000 | 99-1297 |
PARI-FASANO v. ITT HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INS. CO.United States First Circuit
ERISA, Insurance Law
Benefits eligibility determinations by the Social Security Administration are not binding on disability insurers, particularly where the government...
|
10/24/2000 | 99-2239 |
PARI-FASANO v. ITT HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INS. CO.United States First Circuit
ERISA, Insurance Law
Benefits eligibility determinations by the Social Security Administration are not binding on disability insurers, particularly where the government...
|
10/24/2000 | 99-2239 |