all - Opinion Summaries
Page 42 of 42
Showing Result 411 - 420 of 420
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
DUDLEY v. HANNAFORD BROS. CO.United States First Circuit
Constitutional Law
(Industry: Food & Beverage, Retail) A policy, which forbade the manager of the store in question from reconsidering a clerk's initial refusal to sell alcohol to a disabled person whose...
|
06/24/2003 | 02-1382 |
MIDSTATE SIDING & WINDOW CO., INC. v. ROGERSSupreme Court of Illinois
Banking Law, Commercial Law, Consumer Protection Law
(Industry: Retail) The Credit Services Organizations Act does not apply to a transaction between a retailer and customers, where the retailer facilitated the extension...
|
06/10/2003 | 89059 |
US v. MACHADOUnited States Eleventh Circuit
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing
(Industry: Retail) District court erred in measuring loss on the basis of the retail value of the theft, rather than the wholesale value, as the appropriate standard for...
|
06/10/2003 | 02-11288 |
MORRIS v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.United States Sixth Circuit
Injury & Tort Law, Property Law & Real Estate
(Industry: Retail) Judgment as a matter of law for a department store in a slip-and-fall case is reversed where material evidence was sufficient for an inference that...
|
06/04/2003 | 01-5893 |
WAL-MART STORES, INC. v. JOHNSONSupreme Court of Texas
Civil Procedure, Injury & Tort Law, Sanctions
(Industry: Retail) Defendant in a personal injury action arising from falling merchandise had no duty to preserve certain missing evidence, and the trial court abused...
|
05/22/2003 | 01-0441 |
ARGUELLO v. CONOCO, INC.United States Fifth Circuit
Civil Rights, Commercial Law
(Industry: Retail) Customers intending to make a purchase were not deprived of their ability to enter into a contract on non-discriminatory terms under 42 U.S.C. section...
|
05/05/2003 | 01-11549 |
FLOREZ v. LINENS 'N THINGS, INC.Commercial Law, Consumer Protection Law
(Industry: Retail) An allegation that a store improperly requests personal identification information from its customers is sufficient to state a viable cause of action...
|
04/30/2003 | G030590 |
BROZO v. ORACLE CORP.United States Eighth Circuit
Commercial Law, Contracts
(Industry: Retail) A plan governing a sales representative's commissions was not ambiguous, as it clearly reserved to the company the discretion to cap plaintiff's...
|
03/28/2003 | 02-1309 |
GEN. TRADING INT'L, INC. v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.United States Eighth Circuit
Commercial Law, Contracts, Cyberspace Law
(Industry: Retail) Both the terms of parties' agreement for goods sold and the statute of frauds barred enforcement of an alleged oral agreement to reduce the amount...
|
02/25/2003 | 02-1947/2064 |
LORILLARD TOBACCO CO. v. ROTHCourt of Appeals of New York
Administrative Law, Commercial Law, Tax Law
(Industry: Retail, Manufacturing) The Department of Taxation and Finance properly found that certain cigarette manufacturers' promotions may be presumed to create a kind of price...
|
02/13/2003 | 4 No. 6 |