all - Opinion Summaries
Page 41 of 42
Showing Result 401 - 410 of 420
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
IN THE MATTER OF KMART CORP.United States Seventh Circuit
Bankruptcy Law
(Industry: Retail) Bankruptcy judge erred in permitting debtor to pay in full its pre-petition debts to any vendor deemed "critical" in its unilateral estimation....
|
02/24/2004 | 03-1956 |
SULLIVAN v. THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC.United States First Circuit
Civil Rights, Labor & Employment Law
(Industry: Retail) Even assuming that work is a "major life activity" under the ADA, plaintiff failed to show that his alcoholism substantially interfered with his...
|
02/13/2004 | 03-1606 |
VO v. CITY OF GARDEN GROVECalifornia Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Government Law
(Industry: Retail) Court improperly enjoined defendant from enforcing several city ordinance provisions regarding cybercafes. Requiring each cybercafe to maintain video...
|
01/29/2004 | G032058 |
ALBERT v. SMITH'S FOOD & DRUG CTRS., INC.United States Tenth Circuit
Civil Rights, Labor & Employment Law
(Industry: Retail) District court erred in granting summary judgment to defendant on employee's ADA claim. She raised a genuine issue of material fact as to whether her...
|
01/29/2004 | 02-2052 |
GOLIGHT, INC. v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
(Industry: Retail) District court did not err in ruling that defendant willfully infringed claim 11 of plaintiff's patent by importing portable, wireless,...
|
01/20/2004 | 02-1608 |
IA 80 GROUP, INC. v. USUnited States Eighth Circuit
Tax Law
(Industry: Retail) Under the gross revenue test, taxpayer's multi-building truck stops were properly characterized as retail convenience stores, rather than retail motor...
|
10/30/2003 | 02-3012 |
WATKINS, INC. v. LEWISUnited States Eighth Circuit
Remedies
(Industry: Retail) In a case involving the cancellation of a direct-seller merchandise purchase agreement, the district court did not err in finding plaintiffs were not...
|
10/21/2003 | 02-3901 |
NASH FINCH CO. v. RUBLOFF HASTINGS, L.L.C.United States Eighth Circuit
Commercial Law, Contracts, Landlord Tenant Law, Property Law & Real Estate
(Industry: Retail) Assignee of lease was a bona fide purchaser for value, and did not have notice of mistake in legal description of property subject to exclusivity...
|
08/28/2003 | 02-1962 |
FREEMAN v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.California Court of Appeal
Commercial Law, Consumer Protection Law
(Industry: Retail) The trial court appropriately concluded that a shopping card service fee was not an unconscionable term and thus did not abuse its discretion in...
|
08/25/2003 | E032585 |
DETROIT EDISON CO. v. FED. ENERGY REGULATORY COMM'NUnited States DC Circuit
Administrative Law, Public Utilities
(Industry: Retail) By accepting a tariff filing that allows retail customers to take electric distribution service and asserting jurisdiction over unbundled retail...
|
07/08/2003 | 02-1013 |