all - Opinion Summaries
Page 551 of 555
Showing Result 5501 - 5510 of 5547
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
MINNAUGH v. COUNTY COMM'N OF BROWARD COUNTYSupreme Court of Florida
Property Law & Real EstateSmall-scale development amendment decisions made under section 163.3187(1)(c) of the Florida Statutes are legislative in nature and subject to the... |
04/12/2001 | sc00-875 |
COASTAL DEV. OF N. FLORIDA, INC. v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE BEACHSupreme Court of Florida
Property Law & Real EstateSmall-scale development amendment decisions made under section 163.3187(1)(c) of the Florida Statutes are legislative in nature and subject to the... |
04/12/2001 | sc95686 |
COALITION ADVOCATING LEGAL HOUS. OPTIONS v. CITY OF SANTA MONICACalifornia Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Property Law & Real EstateZoning ordinance, allowing the creation of "second units" in single-family residential zones only if the person occupying the second unit is the... |
04/11/2001 | B135879 |
US v. PONNAPULAUnited States Sixth Circuit
Contracts, Property Law & Real EstateLienholders are entitled to the entire amount of earnest money deposited at a foreclosure auction where defendant breached an enforceable contract of... |
04/04/2001 | 98-6678, 99-5190, 99-5192 |
MOORE v. TEXACO, INC.United States Tenth Circuit
Property Law & Real EstateIn public nuisance suit involving polluted groundwater, evidence that landowner owned a tank farm on property, by itself, is insufficient to show... |
04/03/2001 | 00-6043 |
FLO-SUN, INC. v. KIRKSupreme Court of Florida
Property Law & Real EstateChapter 403 of the Florida Statutes, which regulates air and water pollution, does not preempt a public nuisance cause of action under Chapter 823 of... |
03/29/2001 | sc95044, sc95045 |
CITY OF NEW YORK v. STRINGFELLOW'S OF NEW YORK, LTD.Court of Appeals of New York
Property Law & Real EstateA topless bar that adopts a policy of admitting minors is still an "adult eating or drinking establishment" under New York City Zoning Resolution... |
03/29/2001 | 1 No. 35 |
SUMMIT FIN. HOLDINGS, LTD. v. CONT'L LAWYERS TITLE CO.California Court of Appeal
Property Law & Real EstateAn escrow holder owes a duty of care only to the parties to and participants in the escrow. |
03/27/2001 | D036868 |
SAVE THE SUNSET STRIP COALITION v. CITY OF W. HOLLYWOODCalifornia Court of Appeal
Property Law & Real EstateVehicle Code section 21101 does not require a city creating a cul-du-sac to find that the street was no longer needed for vehicle traffic. |
03/20/2001 | B143615 |
TRAVERSO v. DEP'T OF TRANSP.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Property Law & Real EstateState transit agency has no obligation to renew billboard permits that expired 25 years ago. |
03/20/2001 | A087456 |
Results 5501 to 5510 of 5547