Skip to main content

all - Opinion Summaries

FILL IN AT LEAST ONE FIELD

Format is YYYYMMDD

Page 481 of 485 Showing Result 4801 - 4810 of 4849
Description Date Docket #

GALVEZ v. FRIELDS

California Court of Appeal
Health Law, Injury & Tort Law
Violation of 17 CCR section 6527, which requires clinicians to advise all pregnant women in their care of the availability of a test to screen for...
05/15/2001 B125543

US v. OAKLAND CANNABIS BUYERS' COOP.

United States Supreme Court
Health Law
The Controlled Substances Act, 21 USC 801 et seq., does not permit distribution of marijuana except for research purposes, and medical necessity is...
05/14/2001 00-151

ULSTER HOME CARE, INC. v. VACCO

Court of Appeals of New York
Constitutional Law, Government Benefits, Health Law
New York's Medicaid reimbursement rate regulation for providers of personal care services is not unconstitutionally vague.
05/10/2001 3 No. 59

PEOPLE v. RUBIN

Court of Appeals of New York
Constitutional Law, Government Benefits, Health Law
The public charge provision of New York's Medicaid reimbursement regulation, 18 NYCRR 505.14(h)(7)(ii)(a)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to a...
05/10/2001 3 No. 60

UHI, INC. v. THOMPSON

United States Sixth Circuit
Administrative Law, Government Benefits, Health Law
A dismissal on procedural grounds under the Medicare Act constitutes a "final decision" subject to judicial review, but will not be reversed absent...
05/09/2001 99-4418

OLSZEWSKI v. SCRIPPSHEALTH

California Court of Appeal
Health Law, Injury & Tort Law
Federal Medicaid law, 42 USC 1396a(a)(25)(C), preempts Welfare and Institutions Code section 14124.791, which allows health care providers who provide...
05/09/2001 D034197

CONCOURSE REHAB. & NURSING CTR. INC. v. WHALEN

United States Second Circuit
Health Law
Under the Medicaid Act, a State requirement to "reasonably and adequately reimburse" nursing facilities for rehabilitative treatment is not too vague...
05/04/2001 00-9394

SMITH v. RASMUSSEN

United States Eighth Circuit
Government Benefits, Health Law
State regulation excluding sex reassignment surgery was not unreasonable, arbitrary or inconsistent with the Medicaid Act, even if plaintiff qualified...
05/04/2001 99-3262

BLUE DIAMOND COAL CO v. TR. OF UNITED MINEWORKERS OF AM.

United States Sixth Circuit
Government Benefits, Health Law
Given the length of time after the final judgment entered against plaintiff for health benefit payments under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit...
05/03/2001 99-6110, 6111

McCALL v. PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

Supreme Court of California
Health Law
State law claims against a health maintenance organization, arising out of its refusal to provide services under a Medicare-subsidized health plan, do...
05/03/2001 S082236

Results 4801 to 4810 of 4849

Copied to clipboard