all - Opinion Summaries
Page 386 of 393
Showing Result 3851 - 3860 of 3928
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
CENTENNIAL INS. CO. v. US FIRE INS. CO.California Court of Appeal
Insurance LawWhere multiple insurance companies owe a duty to defend a single insured, courts have discretion to apportion the defense costs among them and such... |
03/30/2001 | A090305 |
LOMES v. HARTFORD FIN. SERV. GROUP, INC.California Court of Appeal
Insurance LawInsurer of company had no duty to defend counterclaim against former director where former director filed suit against the corporation and... |
03/29/2001 | B137677 |
AM. MED. INT'L, INC. v. NAT'L UNION FIRE INS. CO. OF PITTSBURGHUnited States Ninth Circuit
Insurance LawExcess director and officers insurance policy that excluded coverage for suits filed by directors or "past directors" of the company does not cover a... |
03/27/2001 | 97-56562 |
FROMM V. PRINCIPAL HEALTH CARE OF IOWA, INC.United States Eighth Circuit
ERISA, Insurance LawERISA exemption of "governmental plan[s]" from coverage precludes a city employee's ERISA claim for denial of health benefits under the city's health... |
03/27/2001 | 00-2409 |
VLASS v. RAYTHEON EMPLOYEES DISABILITY TRUSTUnited States First Circuit
Administrative Law, Insurance LawWhere there was conflicting evidence as to the effect of complainant's pain on his ability to function in a normal workplace without physical demands,... |
03/26/2001 | 00-1956 |
POSADAS DE PUERTO RICO ASSOC., INC. v. NAT'L LABOR RELATIONS BD.United States First Circuit
Insurance Law, Labor & Employment LawWhere an employer unilaterally discontinues a group cancer and life insurance policy that had been in effect for 20 years without first bargaining to... |
03/23/2001 | 00-1421 |
NEW CASTLE COUNTY DE v. NAT'L UNION FIRE INS. CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PAUnited States Third Circuit
Contracts, Insurance LawPublic policy demands that when insurance companies use the phrase "invasion of the right of private occupancy" without defining it, after litigating... |
03/21/2001 | 00-5157 |
SHAPS v. PROVIDENT LIFE & ACCIDENT INS. CO.United States Eleventh Circuit
Insurance LawFlorida Supreme Court certified to determine whether requiring the insured to prove disability is Florida law, or must the burden of proof be on the... |
03/19/2001 | 98-5500, 99-4028 |
BASICH v. ALLSTATE INS. CO.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Insurance LawInsurance company may be estopped from claiming one-year statute of limitations for bringing bad faith claims where its employees made inconsistent... |
03/16/2001 | B132634 |
Results 3851 to 3860 of 3928