all - Opinion Summaries
Page 334 of 393
Showing Result 3331 - 3340 of 3928
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
CONNECTICUT GEN. LIFE INS. CO. v. NEW IMAGES OF BEVERLY HILLSArray
Asset Forfeiture, Insurance Law, RemediesThe district court properly granted a preliminary injunction freezing appellant's assets, where plaintiffs in an action arising from an insurance... |
03/03/2003 | 02-55883 |
CAMPANELLI v. ALLSTATE LIFE INS. CO.Array
Civil Procedure, Contracts, Insurance Law, Property Law & Real EstateActions by homeowners against an insurer for undervaluation of claims were time-barred, but were revived by California Code of Civil Procedure section... |
03/03/2003 | 00-55466/55468/55957/57080 |
HAUGH v. ALLSTATE INS. CO.United States Third Circuit
Civil Procedure, Insurance LawWhere it is unclear on the record whether plaintiff's action is time barred, and where plaintiff, the insured's assignee, adequately pled a viable... |
02/28/2003 | 01-4197 |
CANAL INS. CO. v. DISTRIB. SERVS., INC.United States Fourth Circuit
Insurance LawAn "Endorsement for Motor Carrier Policies of Insurance for Public Liability Under Sections 29 and 30 of the Motor Carrier Act of 1980," commonly... |
02/27/2003 | 02-1226 |
AM. HERITAGE LIFE INS. CO. v. LANGUnited States Fifth Circuit
Contracts, Dispute Resolution & Arbitration, Insurance LawWhere plaintiff had notice of defendant's ignorance, the alleged failure to identify and explain arbitration agreements at issue may constitute fraud... |
02/26/2003 | 02-60639 |
S. PINE HELICOPTERS, INC. v. PHOENIX AVIATION MANAGERS, INC.United States Eighth Circuit
Injury & Tort Law, Insurance LawEvidence was sufficient to support jury finding of insurance coverage in a case involving damage to plaintiff's helicopter, and insurer was entitled... |
02/26/2003 | 01-3931/32 |
VANLINER INS. CO. v. SAMPATUnited States Seventh Circuit
Contracts, Injury & Tort Law, Insurance LawAt the time of a motor vehicle accident, a driver did not have permission to use a trailer under Indiana's rule of permissive use, thus any coverage... |
02/25/2003 | 02-2309 |
PARNELL v. ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM/WESTCalifornia Court of Appeal
Health Law, Insurance LawA hospital that has received full payment for services under the terms of its contract with a medical insurance provider is not entitled to file a... |
02/25/2003 | F038004 |
ADMIRAL INS. CO. v. FEIT MGMT. CO.Array
Contracts, Injury & Tort Law, Insurance LawIn a dispute over the precise meaning of "from," injuries for which the insured seek coverage were caused by toxic fumes that came from the hot water... |
02/20/2003 | 01-10331 |
CONOVER v. AETNA US HEALTH CARE, INC.United States Tenth Circuit
ERISA, Insurance Law, Labor & Employment LawOklahoma's bad faith law is not saved from preemption under ERISA because it does not regulate insurance, and it is therefore preempted because it... |
02/20/2003 | 01-5172 |
Results 3331 to 3340 of 3928