all - Opinion Summaries
Page 326 of 337
Showing Result 3251 - 3260 of 3369
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
CHOU v. UNIV. OF CHICAGOUnited States Federal Circuit
Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, PatentA putative inventor has standing to sue to correct inventorship under 35 USC 256, even without a potential ownership interest in the patent, where the... |
07/03/2001 | 00-1317 |
RAPOPORT v. DEMENTUnited States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentWhere the asserted prior art discusses treatment of a symptom, but does not anticipate that the discussed method would address the cause, the prior... |
06/28/2001 | 00-1451 |
DUREL CORP. v. OSRAM SYLVANIA INC.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentThe district court is free to use outside sources in its claim construction, such as calculations of atomic mass percent, but not if the resulting... |
06/27/2001 | 00-1261, 00-1391 |
GART v. LOGITECH, INC.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentThe written description of a claim must explicitly limit the subject matter of the patent because drawings will only depict the preferred embodiment... |
06/26/2001 | 00-1088 |
NILSSEN v. MOTOROLA, INC.United States Seventh Circuit
Civil Procedure, Injury & Tort Law, Intellectual Property, PatentThe district court must consolidate plaintiff's patent and trade secrets claims in district court because it was a mistake to separate the claims. |
06/25/2001 | 00-2049 |
NEW YORK TIMES CO., INC. v. TASINIUnited States Supreme Court
Intellectual Property, CopyrightDatabases that reproduce and distribute articles standing alone and not in context, and not as part of that particular collective work to which the... |
06/25/2001 | 00-201 |
SHIELDS v. ZUCCARINIUnited States Third Circuit
Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, TrademarkRegistering as domain names the misspellings of famous marks for purposes of profiting from consumer confusion violates 15 USC 1125(d)(1)(A)(ii)(I)... |
06/15/2001 | 00-2236 |
GROUP ONE, LTD. v HALLMARK CARDS, INC.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent35 USC 102(b), the on-sale bar to patent validity, requires a definite formal offer for sale in the contracts sense. |
06/15/2001 | 00-1014 |
BREED v. HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO.United States Ninth Circuit
Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, PatentFederal Circuit Court of Appeal has appellate jurisdiction over suit that had patent claim even though there were 13 other non-patent claims and state... |
06/14/2001 | 99-56130 |
CADENCE DESIGN SYS., INC. v. AVANT! CORP.United States Ninth Circuit
Intellectual Property, Trade SecretsCalifornia Supreme Court certified to determine whether, under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, an infringment arises only upon the initial... |
06/11/2001 | 99-17648 |
Results 3251 to 3260 of 3369