Skip to main content

all - Opinion Summaries

FILL IN AT LEAST ONE FIELD

Format is YYYYMMDD

Page 320 of 337 Showing Result 3191 - 3200 of 3369
Description Date Docket #

EXXON CORP. v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO.

United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
Although the PTO has no authority to waive the statutory requirement that every patent application must have at least one claim when filed, the PTO...
09/21/2001 00-1173; 00-1174

EXXON RESEARCH & ENG'G CO. v. US

United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
A patent specification that teaches using the time quantity term "for a period sufficient" does not need to identify an upper or lower boundary for...
09/19/2001 00-5077

IN RE INLAND STEEL CO.

United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
The fact that a patent teaches two steps produces optimal results does not negate the additional teaching that one step alone may have beneficial...
09/19/2001 00-1143

BROWN v. 3M

United States Federal Circuit
Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
Where a claim is written using the disjunctive "or," and one of the options is anticipated by prior art, the entire claim is invalid for lack of...
09/18/2001 00-1552

HARBOR MOTOR CO., INC. v. ARNELL CHEVROLET-GEO, INC

United States Seventh Circuit
Attorney's Fees, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Copyright
Only prevailing parties can receive attorney's fees pursuant to F. R. Civ. Proc. 68, and an unapportioned offer under Rule 68, on behalf of multiple...
09/17/2001 00-3286

HILGRAEVE CORP. v. SYMENTEC CORP.

United States Federal Circuit
Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
Where the claim construction distinguishes prior art as unable to prevent an operating system from accessing a computer virus, defendant's expert...
09/17/2001 00-1373; 00-1374

PIECZENIK v. DYAX CORP.

United States Federal Circuit
Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Patent
Even assuming that the defendant infringed plaintiff's patent, where plaintiff alleges that the infringing activity concluded prior to delivery of the...
09/17/2001 00-1519

FINA TECH. INC. v. EWEN

United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
35 USC 256 does not give the district court authority to order a change in the order of inventors.
09/17/2001 00-1578

DOWNING v. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH

United States Ninth Circuit
Intellectual Property, Copyright
Federal copyright law does not preempt a California state law claim for right of publicity even if the publisher purchased the copyright of the...
09/13/2001 00-55363

LOGAN v. BURGERS OZARK COUNTRY CURED HAMS INC.

United States Fifth Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent, False Advertising
Where a company advertises a product that is only possible through the use of a process for which the company does not have a license, the inventor of...
09/12/2001 00-30652

Results 3191 to 3200 of 3369

Copied to clipboard