all - Opinion Summaries
Page 320 of 337
Showing Result 3191 - 3200 of 3369
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
EXXON CORP. v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentAlthough the PTO has no authority to waive the statutory requirement that every patent application must have at least one claim when filed, the PTO... |
09/21/2001 | 00-1173; 00-1174 |
EXXON RESEARCH & ENG'G CO. v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentA patent specification that teaches using the time quantity term "for a period sufficient" does not need to identify an upper or lower boundary for... |
09/19/2001 | 00-5077 |
IN RE INLAND STEEL CO.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentThe fact that a patent teaches two steps produces optimal results does not negate the additional teaching that one step alone may have beneficial... |
09/19/2001 | 00-1143 |
BROWN v. 3MUnited States Federal Circuit
Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, PatentWhere a claim is written using the disjunctive "or," and one of the options is anticipated by prior art, the entire claim is invalid for lack of... |
09/18/2001 | 00-1552 |
HARBOR MOTOR CO., INC. v. ARNELL CHEVROLET-GEO, INCUnited States Seventh Circuit
Attorney's Fees, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, CopyrightOnly prevailing parties can receive attorney's fees pursuant to F. R. Civ. Proc. 68, and an unapportioned offer under Rule 68, on behalf of multiple... |
09/17/2001 | 00-3286 |
HILGRAEVE CORP. v. SYMENTEC CORP.United States Federal Circuit
Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, PatentWhere the claim construction distinguishes prior art as unable to prevent an operating system from accessing a computer virus, defendant's expert... |
09/17/2001 | 00-1373; 00-1374 |
PIECZENIK v. DYAX CORP.United States Federal Circuit
Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, PatentEven assuming that the defendant infringed plaintiff's patent, where plaintiff alleges that the infringing activity concluded prior to delivery of the... |
09/17/2001 | 00-1519 |
FINA TECH. INC. v. EWENUnited States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent35 USC 256 does not give the district court authority to order a change in the order of inventors. |
09/17/2001 | 00-1578 |
DOWNING v. ABERCROMBIE & FITCHUnited States Ninth Circuit
Intellectual Property, CopyrightFederal copyright law does not preempt a California state law claim for right of publicity even if the publisher purchased the copyright of the... |
09/13/2001 | 00-55363 |
LOGAN v. BURGERS OZARK COUNTRY CURED HAMS INC.United States Fifth Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent, False AdvertisingWhere a company advertises a product that is only possible through the use of a process for which the company does not have a license, the inventor of... |
09/12/2001 | 00-30652 |
Results 3191 to 3200 of 3369