all - Opinion Summaries
Page 280 of 295
Showing Result 2791 - 2800 of 2941
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
IN RE: MARK L.California Court of Appeal
Evidence, Family LawEvidence Code section 1012 allows a psychotherapist to provide court with information needed to determine therapeutic progress or changed... |
12/13/2001 | D037827, D038425 |
IN RE: LUNA v. DOBSONCourt of Appeals of New York
Civil Procedure, Family LawUnder Connecticut law a "with prejudice" disciplinary dismissal is not necessarily a dismissal "on the merits" that would give it preclusive effect. |
12/13/2001 | 2 No. 158 |
IN RE: KRISTINE W.California Court of Appeal
Evidence, Family LawThe psychotherapist-patient privilege protects a juvenile's confidential communications and details of the therapy, but does not preclude the... |
12/12/2001 | D038074 |
IN RE: EMMANUEL R.California Court of Appeal
Family LawThe Interstate Compact on Placement of Children, Fam. Code 7900 et seq., does not prevent a California court from ordering visitation between a... |
12/11/2001 | A095992 |
MARK L. v. MARCI S.California Court of Appeal
Family LawUnder Family Code section 7631, a biological father that defeats the presumption of paternity against the mother's husband must still show that... |
12/11/2001 | G029019 |
COUNTY OF LAKE v. PALLACalifornia Court of Appeal
Family LawOnce a putative parent defaults against a child support petition under Family Code section 17430, a trial court cannot require the government to prove... |
12/10/2001 | A095124, A095126, A095127 |
BARNETT v. BARNETTSupreme Court of Texas
ERISA, Family LawA life insurance policy obtained through an employee benefit plan was community property but the Employee Retirement Income Security Act preempts a... |
12/06/2001 | 99-0313 |
MACAR v. MACARSupreme Court of Florida
Family LawChallenges to final judgements that incorporate marital settlement agreements reached after the commencement of marital dissolution litigation, and... |
12/06/2001 | sc00-2542 |
HUBNER v. HUBNERCalifornia Court of Appeal
Family LawA parent, as an extraordinarily high earner who admits an ability to pay any amount of child support, may not refuse to reveal his actual income where... |
12/05/2001 | B123203 |
IN RE HARRY N.California Court of Appeal
Family LawUnder Welfare and Institutions Code 366.26(k)), the "preference" for the caretaker family applies only to preference in processing an adoption... |
11/28/2001 | B145977 |
Results 2791 to 2800 of 2941