all - Opinion Summaries

LIGHTING WORLD, INC. BIRCHWOOD LIGHTING, INC.

Intellectual Property, Patent
Summary judgment against plaintiff's allegations of infringement is reversed where the district court committed errors in claim construction and...

JUICY WHIP, INC. v. ORANGE BANG, INC.

Intellectual Property, Patent
Denial of plaintiff's claim for lost profits from their infringed beverage dispenser patent is reversed where the district court erred as a matter of...

POLAR BEAR PRODUCTION, INC. v. TIMEX CORP.

Copyright, Intellectual Property, Trademark
A plaintiff in a copyright infringement action must establish a sufficient causal connection between the infringement and the infringer's profits it...

COCA-COLA CO. v. PURDY

Constitutional Law, Consumer Protection Law, Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, Trademark
First Amendment does not protect the use of another's trademark in a domain name to attract an unwitting and unwilling audience to the message of the...

THE CHAMBERLAIN GROUP v. SKYLINK TECHS.

Copyright, Intellectual Property
The district court's finding that defendant did not violate the anti-trafficking provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act is affirmed where...

XECHEM INT'L INC. v. THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS

Constitutional Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
Plaintiff's suit is dismissed where defendant-university is not subject to suit in federal court as plaintiff's pleadings and representations do not...

HOME DIAGNOSTICS, INC. v. LIFESCAN, INC.

Health Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
The district court's finding that plaintiff did not infringe defendant's patent for detecting the concentration of glucose in whole blood is reversed...

CARDIAC PACEMAKERS, INC. v. ST. JUDE MED.

Health Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
In a patent suit involving heart defibrillators, judgment as a matter of law for defendant is reversed where the patent is not invalid for obviousness...

CARDIAC PACEMAKERS, INC. v. ST. JUDE MED.

Health Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
In a patent suit involving heart defibrillators, judgment as a matter of law for defendant is reversed where the patent is not invalid for obviousness...

CARDIAC PACEMAKERS, INC. v. ST. JUDE MED.

Health Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
In a patent suit involving heart defibrillators, judgment as a matter of law for defendant is reversed where the patent is not invalid for obviousness...