all - Opinion Summaries
Page 247 of 295
Showing Result 2461 - 2470 of 2941
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
IN RE A.A.California Court of Appeal
Family LawTrial court erred in refusing to grant "presumed father" status to man who provided for and maintained a relationship with the minor child. Court also... |
12/22/2003 | B163195, B164378 |
IN RE MARRIAGE OF KINGSupreme Court of Illinois
Family Law, Judgement Enforcement, Property Law & Real EstateBecause the January 5, 1999 order was not the final judgment as to attorney fees owed, it would not support a lien on real estate; because that order... |
12/18/2003 | 95878 |
IN RE D.F.Supreme Court of Illinois
Family LawThe nine-month evaluation period for assessing whether a given parent is "unfit" applies to both the reasonable-efforts ground and the... |
12/18/2003 | 94479 |
IN RE ANDREA F.Supreme Court of Illinois
Family LawPrior to January 1, 1998, Juvenile Court Act section 1-5(3) did not require trial courts to admonish parents that they risked having their parental... |
12/18/2003 | 93595 |
MCCURDY v. DODDUnited States Third Circuit
Constitutional Law, Family LawA parent's interest in the companionship of his independent adult child is not a cognizable constitutional right protected by the Due Process Clause.... |
12/17/2003 | 02-2708 |
STATE OF TEXAS v. GHARBICourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & Procedure, Family LawEvidence is sufficient to support defendant's two convictions for violating a protective order, notwithstanding an unnecessary allegation in the... |
12/17/2003 | 1543-02, 1545-02 |
FORETICH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, OFFICE OF THE MAYORUnited States DC Circuit
Constitutional Law, Family LawCongress violated the constitutional prohibition against bills of attainder by singling out plaintiff for legislative punishment. In enacting the... |
12/16/2003 | 02-5224 |
IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF ROSS AND KELLEYCalifornia Court of Appeal
Family LawTrial courts are not per se prohibited from granting grandparent visitation, particularly where the parties stipulate to such visitation. The court... |
12/10/2003 | D041602 |
IN RE MARRIAGE OF W.California Court of Appeal
Family LawThe application of Family Code section 3101 in an ordered visitation arrangement for grandparents violated the father's substantive due process right... |
12/09/2003 | B161235 |
IN RE RACHEL M.California Court of Appeal
Family Law, Juvenile LawMother's appeal of court's termination of her parental rights pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 is affirmed because a mother's... |
12/04/2003 | D041731 |
Results 2461 to 2470 of 2941