all - Opinion Summaries
Page 235 of 251
Showing Result 2341 - 2350 of 2506
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
LEGAL ENVTL. ASSISTANCE FOUND., INC. v. US ENVTL. PROT. AGENCYUnited States Eleventh Circuit
Environmental LawUnder Section 1425 of the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 USC 300h-4(a), the process of hydraulic fracturing to recover methane gas from underground coal... |
12/21/2001 | 00-10381 |
SAFETY-KLEEN, INC. v. WYCHEUnited States Fourth Circuit
Bankruptcy Law, Environmental LawUnder 11 USC 362(b)(4), the regulatory exception to the automatic stay of bankruptcy applies to South Carolina bond requirements for environmental... |
12/19/2001 | 00-2170 |
CHURCHILL COUNTY v. NORTONUnited States Ninth Circuit
Environmental LawProgrammatic environmental impact statements are not required to determine the cumulative impact of proposed environmental actions where the agency... |
12/19/2001 | 00-15967 |
US v. PEARSONUnited States Ninth Circuit
Criminal Law & Procedure, Environmental LawUnder the criminal provisions of the Clean Air Act for asbestos removal, 42 USC 7412-7413, a defendant can be both a "supervisor" and an "employee"... |
12/18/2001 | 00-30086 |
KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUP v. ROCKWELL INT'L CORP.United States Sixth Circuit
Environmental LawIf other defendants release vast quantities of hazardous material, a defendant may still escape clean-up liability under CERCLA if its release was... |
12/18/2001 | 00-1774 |
US v. CHEMETCO, INC.United States Seventh Circuit
Criminal Law & Procedure, Environmental LawUnder Section 301 of the Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1311(a), the number of violation days is a sentencing factor, not an element of the offense that must... |
12/17/2001 | 00-3940 |
ARIZONA CATTLE GROWERS' ASS'N v. US FISH & WILDLIFEUnited States Ninth Circuit
Environmental LawUnder Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, an actual incidental take is a prerequisite for an Incidental Take Statement. |
12/17/2001 | 99-16102, 99-16103, 00-15322, 00-15511 |
SUN VALLEY PACKING v. CONSEP, INC.California Court of Appeal
Environmental LawFederal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act 7 USC 136 et seq., does not preempt state law claims against the manufacturer of a pest control... |
12/10/2001 | F034621 |
US v. KAYSER-ROTH CORP.United States First Circuit
Environmental LawA declaratory judgment that parent company operated a subsidiary's facility that discharged pollutants remains unaffected by later case law regarding... |
12/03/2001 | 00-2038 |
STEELTECH, LTD. v. US ENVTL. PROT. AGENCYUnited States Sixth Circuit
Environmental LawUnder the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, 42 USC 11001-11050, calculating the civil penalty by means of the Environmental Response... |
11/28/2001 | 00-2008 |
Results 2341 to 2350 of 2506