all - Opinion Summaries

INTERGRAPH CORP. v. INTEL CORP.

Intellectual Property, Patent
Where a corporation sells a division, along with rights relating to patents developed by that division, a pre-exisisting third party license does not...

AMAZON, INC. v. BARNESANDNOBLE.COM, LLC.

Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
Plaintiff is not entitled to a preliminary injunction on a likelihood of prevailing on a patent infringement claim where the validity of the patent is...

DEMARINI SPORTS, INC. v. WORTH, INC.

Intellectual Property, Patent
Where a term was not in dispute in a prior case and the district court-s discussion of the term was simply to give context to the discussion of other,...

FOREST LAB., INC. v. ABBOTT LAB.

Intellectual Property, Patent
When the surface active material, as described in the patent, is combined with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, it does not necessarily cease to...

BIOVAIL CORP. INT'L v. ANDRX PHARM, INC.

Intellectual Property, Patent
The -admixture- limitation in plaintiff's claim must be -homogeneous- because the remarks accompanying the amendment after final rejection also...

MONON CORP. v. STOUGHTON TRAILERS, INC.

Intellectual Property, Patent
Evidence that a patentee's sale of a product prior to the critical date of its patent was primarily experimental, and thus was not "commercial sale"...

AFG INDUS., INC. v. CARDINAL IG CO., INC.

Intellectual Property, Patent
While the words "composed of" in claim may generally be synonymous with "consisting of," there may be circumstances where a broader meaning is more...

WENGER MFG, INC. v. COATING MACH. SYS, INC.

Intellectual Property, Patent
The district court erred in interpreting the "air circulation means" limitation as requiring structure capable of recirculating air because the...

LITTON SYS., INC. v. HONEYWELL, INC.

Injury & Tort Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
Even though the district court correctly found non-infringement based on the doctrine of equivalents, a jury should have decided the factual elements...

FLEX-FOOT, INC. v. CRP, INC.

Intellectual Property, Patent
Patent law does not necessarily require that an arbitrator set forth the full scope of claim terms in claims construction, and public policy...