all - Opinion Summaries
Page 204 of 207
Showing Result 2031 - 2040 of 2064
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
GOLD v. UNITED HEALTH SERV. HOSP. INC.Court of Appeals of New York
Government BenefitsMedicaid's recoupment provisions, under Section 104(2) of the Social Services Law, are not subject to limitation of the amount that a public welfare... |
02/15/2001 | 3 No. 7 |
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE v. NEVITTCalifornia Court of Appeal
Family Law, Government BenefitsWhere a parent is eligible for AFDC aid, gifts and inheritance are income for support purposes just as lottery winnings are income for those purposes. |
02/14/2001 | E026724 |
MORRIS v. PRINCIPIUnited States Federal Circuit
Civil Procedure, Government BenefitsFederal Circuit appellate jurisdiction with respect to a decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims is limited to review of the validity of... |
02/13/2001 | 00-7058 |
SHEEHAN v. DEPT. OF THE NAVYUnited States Federal Circuit
Civil Rights, Government Benefits, Military LawIn actions based on asserted discriminatory treatment under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, 38 USC 4301-4333,... |
02/13/2001 | 00-3271, 00-3272 |
HOGAN v. APFELUnited States Eighth Circuit
Government BenefitsSubstantial evidence supported Administrative Law Judge's finding that claimant retained residual functional capacity to return to her past relevant... |
02/12/2001 | 00-1515 |
GOOSE v. APFELUnited States Eighth Circuit
Government Benefits, Health LawAmple evidence existed, including borderline mental impairment, to show that claimant did not meet the requirements of the listing of impairments to... |
02/09/2001 | 00-1708 |
SCHISM v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Government Benefits, Government Contracts, Military LawWhere recruiters made promises of lifetime free health care to armed forces members who served twenty years, the implied-in-fact contract is binding... |
02/09/2001 | 99-1402 |
MATTHEWS v. APFELUnited States Third Circuit
Government BenefitsOnly new and material evidence, where good cause exists for not producing the evidence earlier, may be reviewed by the district court or serve as the... |
02/08/2001 | 00-1151 |
ALLEN v. PRINCIPIUnited States Federal Circuit
Government Benefits38 USC 1110, as amended by section 8052(a)(2) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, does not preclude a veteran from receiving... |
02/05/2001 | 99-7199 |
NEBBLETT v. OFFICE OF PERS. MGMT.United States Federal Circuit
Government Benefits, Labor & Employment LawThe Office of Personnel Management's interpretation of 5 USC 8336(d)(1), that a constructive termination is not an involuntary separation warranting... |
01/30/2001 | 00-3069 |
Results 2031 to 2040 of 2064