Skip to main content

all - Opinion Summaries

FILL IN AT LEAST ONE FIELD

Format is YYYYMMDD

Page 200 of 210 Showing Result 1991 - 2000 of 2096
Description Date Docket #

DOW CHEMICAL CO. v ASTRO-VALCOUR, INC.

United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
The true inventor need not know that it was the inventor at the time it challenges the validity of a patent issued to someone else, as long as the...
09/28/2001 01-1003

BIO-TECH. GEN. CORP. v. GENENTECH, INC.

United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
When scientific certainty is not available, and the scientific theories and evidence are within a reasonable range of difference of scientific...
09/27/2001 00-1223; 00-1267

THE TORO CO. v. WHITE CONSOL. INDUS., INC.

United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
Even if a function is inherent in the unitary structure, if neither the patent specification nor the claim construction make the inherent function a...
09/25/2001 00-1561

EMI GROUP N. AM., INC. v. CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORP.

United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
Where multiple claims each recite the same mechanism, all claims will be invalid for impossibility if the mechanism is shown to be inoperative.
09/21/2001 00-1508

EXXON CORP. v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO.

United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
Although the PTO has no authority to waive the statutory requirement that every patent application must have at least one claim when filed, the PTO...
09/21/2001 00-1173; 00-1174

EXXON RESEARCH & ENG'G CO. v. US

United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
A patent specification that teaches using the time quantity term "for a period sufficient" does not need to identify an upper or lower boundary for...
09/19/2001 00-5077

IN RE INLAND STEEL CO.

United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, Patent
The fact that a patent teaches two steps produces optimal results does not negate the additional teaching that one step alone may have beneficial...
09/19/2001 00-1143

BROWN v. 3M

United States Federal Circuit
Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
Where a claim is written using the disjunctive "or," and one of the options is anticipated by prior art, the entire claim is invalid for lack of...
09/18/2001 00-1552

HILGRAEVE CORP. v. SYMENTEC CORP.

United States Federal Circuit
Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, Patent
Where the claim construction distinguishes prior art as unable to prevent an operating system from accessing a computer virus, defendant's expert...
09/17/2001 00-1373; 00-1374

PIECZENIK v. DYAX CORP.

United States Federal Circuit
Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Patent
Even assuming that the defendant infringed plaintiff's patent, where plaintiff alleges that the infringing activity concluded prior to delivery of the...
09/17/2001 00-1519

Results 1991 to 2000 of 2096

Copied to clipboard