all - Opinion Summaries
Page 200 of 210
Showing Result 1991 - 2000 of 2096
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
DOW CHEMICAL CO. v ASTRO-VALCOUR, INC.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentThe true inventor need not know that it was the inventor at the time it challenges the validity of a patent issued to someone else, as long as the... |
09/28/2001 | 01-1003 |
BIO-TECH. GEN. CORP. v. GENENTECH, INC.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentWhen scientific certainty is not available, and the scientific theories and evidence are within a reasonable range of difference of scientific... |
09/27/2001 | 00-1223; 00-1267 |
THE TORO CO. v. WHITE CONSOL. INDUS., INC.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentEven if a function is inherent in the unitary structure, if neither the patent specification nor the claim construction make the inherent function a... |
09/25/2001 | 00-1561 |
EMI GROUP N. AM., INC. v. CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORP.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentWhere multiple claims each recite the same mechanism, all claims will be invalid for impossibility if the mechanism is shown to be inoperative. |
09/21/2001 | 00-1508 |
EXXON CORP. v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentAlthough the PTO has no authority to waive the statutory requirement that every patent application must have at least one claim when filed, the PTO... |
09/21/2001 | 00-1173; 00-1174 |
EXXON RESEARCH & ENG'G CO. v. USUnited States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentA patent specification that teaches using the time quantity term "for a period sufficient" does not need to identify an upper or lower boundary for... |
09/19/2001 | 00-5077 |
IN RE INLAND STEEL CO.United States Federal Circuit
Intellectual Property, PatentThe fact that a patent teaches two steps produces optimal results does not negate the additional teaching that one step alone may have beneficial... |
09/19/2001 | 00-1143 |
BROWN v. 3MUnited States Federal Circuit
Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, PatentWhere a claim is written using the disjunctive "or," and one of the options is anticipated by prior art, the entire claim is invalid for lack of... |
09/18/2001 | 00-1552 |
HILGRAEVE CORP. v. SYMENTEC CORP.United States Federal Circuit
Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, PatentWhere the claim construction distinguishes prior art as unable to prevent an operating system from accessing a computer virus, defendant's expert... |
09/17/2001 | 00-1373; 00-1374 |
PIECZENIK v. DYAX CORP.United States Federal Circuit
Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, PatentEven assuming that the defendant infringed plaintiff's patent, where plaintiff alleges that the infringing activity concluded prior to delivery of the... |
09/17/2001 | 00-1519 |
Results 1991 to 2000 of 2096